That makes sense to me, I'll push that change. Thanks! Le ven. 24 nov. 2017 à 10:40, Roman Margolis <roman.margo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Sorry about that. > In my original message, I highlighted the relevant parts which probably > didn't make it to the mail archive. > > I would expect the note to state the following (unless I misunderstood some > of the details): > "Once data is loaded into memory, you can lookup the start pointer of any > document chunk by performing two binary searches: a first one based on the > values of DocBase in order to find the right block, and then inside the > block based on DocBaseDeltas (by reconstructing the doc bases for every > chunk)." > > instead of: > "Once data is loaded into memory, you can lookup the start pointer of any > document by performing two binary searches: a first one based on the values > of DocBase in order to find the right block, and then inside the block > based on DocBaseDeltas (by reconstructing the doc bases for every chunk)." > > The difference between the two is the added word 'chunk' after the word > 'document'. > > Thanks, > Roman Margolis > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Roman, > > > > It's unclear to me what modification you are suggesting, could you please > > share what the updated comment would look like? > > > > Le mer. 22 nov. 2017 à 14:17, Roman Margolis <roman.margo...@gmail.com> > a > > écrit : > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was reading some internal info about Lucene, and was confused by a > note > > > on this page: > > > > > > https://lucene.apache.org/core/7_1_0/core/org/apache/ > > lucene/codecs/compressing/CompressingStoredFieldsIndexWriter.html > > > > > > The note (the last note at the bottom) says: > > > > > > - Once data is loaded into memory, you can lookup the start pointer > of > > > any document by performing two binary searches: a first one based on > > the > > > values of DocBase in order to find the right block, and then inside > > the > > > block based on DocBaseDeltas (by reconstructing the doc bases for > > every > > > chunk). > > > > > > Shouldn't it say chunk, or document chunk (referring to document chunks > > in > > > the field data file)? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Roman Margolis > > > > > >
