Can you run CheckIndex on your index to make sure it is not corrupt? On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:01 AM Nicolás Lichtmaier <nicol...@wolfram.com.invalid> wrote:
> I'm seeing errors like this one (using backwards codecs): > > java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 69 out of bounds for > length 33 > at > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.ForUtil.readBlock(ForUtil.java:196) > at > > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.refillPositions(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:721) > at > > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.nextPosition(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:924) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.PhrasePositions.nextPosition(PhrasePositions.java:57) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.advancePP(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:262) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.nextMatch(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:173) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseScorer$1.matches(PhraseScorer.java:58) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$WeightDoubleValuesSource$1.advanceExact(DoubleValuesSource.java:631) > at > > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$QueryBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:343) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) > at > > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:270) > at > > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:228) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionMaxScorer.score(DisjunctionMaxScorer.java:67) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionScorer.score(DisjunctionScorer.java:194) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$2.doubleValue(DoubleValuesSource.java:344) > at > > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.doubleValue(FunctionScoreQuery.java:265) > at > > org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:229) > at > > org.apache.lucene.search.TopScoreDocCollector$SimpleTopScoreDocCollector$1.collect(TopScoreDocCollector.java:76) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.scoreAll(Weight.java:276) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.score(Weight.java:232) > at org.apache.lucene.search.BulkScorer.score(BulkScorer.java:39) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:661) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:445) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:574) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.searchAfter(IndexSearcher.java:421) > at > org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:432) > > They seem to be connected with double values stored as "docvalues" and > user in formulas to affect the scores. > > Is there any known incompatibility? Is this something that should work? > Must I rebuild the indices with 8.7? (that would be bad for our usecase > here) > > Thanks! > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Adrien
