Lucene 8.7's CheckIndex says there are no errors in the index.
On closer inspection this seems related to phrase matching... El 24/11/20 a las 05:18, Adrien Grand escribió:
Can you run CheckIndex on your index to make sure it is not corrupt? On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:01 AM Nicolás Lichtmaier <nicol...@wolfram.com.invalid> wrote:I'm seeing errors like this one (using backwards codecs): java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 69 out of bounds for length 33 at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.ForUtil.readBlock(ForUtil.java:196) at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.refillPositions(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:721) at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50PostingsReader$EverythingEnum.nextPosition(Lucene50PostingsReader.java:924) at org.apache.lucene.search.PhrasePositions.nextPosition(PhrasePositions.java:57) at org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.advancePP(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:262) at org.apache.lucene.search.SloppyPhraseMatcher.nextMatch(SloppyPhraseMatcher.java:173) at org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseScorer$1.matches(PhraseScorer.java:58) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$WeightDoubleValuesSource$1.advanceExact(DoubleValuesSource.java:631) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$QueryBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:343) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValues$1.advanceExact(DoubleValues.java:53) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.advanceExact(FunctionScoreQuery.java:270) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:228) at org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionMaxScorer.score(DisjunctionMaxScorer.java:67) at org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionScorer.score(DisjunctionScorer.java:194) at org.apache.lucene.search.DoubleValuesSource$2.doubleValue(DoubleValuesSource.java:344) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$MultiplicativeBoostValuesSource$1.doubleValue(FunctionScoreQuery.java:265) at org.apache.lucene.queries.function.FunctionScoreQuery$FunctionScoreWeight$1.score(FunctionScoreQuery.java:229) at org.apache.lucene.search.TopScoreDocCollector$SimpleTopScoreDocCollector$1.collect(TopScoreDocCollector.java:76) at org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.scoreAll(Weight.java:276) at org.apache.lucene.search.Weight$DefaultBulkScorer.score(Weight.java:232) at org.apache.lucene.search.BulkScorer.score(BulkScorer.java:39) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:661) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:445) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:574) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.searchAfter(IndexSearcher.java:421) at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:432) They seem to be connected with double values stored as "docvalues" and user in formulas to affect the scores. Is there any known incompatibility? Is this something that should work? Must I rebuild the indices with 8.7? (that would be bad for our usecase here) Thanks! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
