>I tried it. what is the percentage differential you measure? I trust you ran a benchmark which ran a loop of (say) 50 times?
>I have read somewhere that the C library used is not efficient and that the Intel library is faster. no idea what that's about. Both APIs use the same C lib. Its the IJG lib which is very widely used and hopefully easily optimised by C compilers. Did you try the jai tools version of image i/o? That has some different code .. supposedly faster. -phil. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Phil. I tried it. It it is a faster but not as fast as the old library. It still looks to me that at 400ms this is slow. Shouldn't it be possible to make a multi threaded image reader. Do you know what is really taking most of this time? I have read somewhere that the C library used is not efficient and that the Intel library is faster. Carl [Message sent by forum member 'carcour' (carcour)] http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=212003 =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA2D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
=========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA2D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".