Try the collision detection in 1.2 Alpha, they seems to be better than
1.1.2. But at the moment, I found that the collision detection
(USE_GEOMETRY) in 1.2 Alpha behaves slightly different than the USE_BOUNDS
type collision detection.
Sunny Leung
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Olenin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 1999 4:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JAVA3D] Collisiondetection inexact !?
>
> GEOMETRY bounds are not calculated correctly in version 1.1.2 at
> least. So, USE_BOUNDS collision detection only.
>
> vladimir
> -=V=-
> >-------<=============>-------<
> Join in Java community now!
> http://JavaCafe.VirtualAve.net/
> >-------<=============>-------<
>
> In your previous letter u wrote:
> --------------------------------
> PB> Hello,
> PB> I created two boxes with PickTranslateBehaviors (USE_BOUNDS)
> PB> and CollisionEntryBehaviors (USE_GEOMETRY).
> PB> When moving one box in the range of the other box the CollisionEntry
> is
> PB> much to early. Does anybody knows this problem ?
> PB> thanks in advance
>
> PB> Peter
>
> PB>
> ==========================================================================
> =
> PB> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> PB> of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send
> email to
> PB> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
> ==========================================================================
> =
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
> body
> of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
