On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:40:07 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review a moderately simple improvement for `JavadocTester` and a 
>> related new test.
>> 
>> A new `OutputChecker` class is introduced that mostly supersedes the 
>> existing methods to check the output generated by javadoc and the standard 
>> doclet. A self-imposed restriction is that no existing tests are modified.
>> 
>> The new class can be used to check files generated by the doclet and the 
>> streams written by the tool. It can be configured to check for ordered 
>> output or not, overlapping output, and complete coverage, and can search for 
>> literal strings and regular expressions.  
>> 
>> There is a corresponding new test which is a non-standard use of 
>> `JavadocTester`, since it is designed to test `JavadocTester` itself, and 
>> not javadoc or the doclet.   (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)  Various 
>> methods are overridden so that the operation of the underlying methods can 
>> be checked.
>> 
>> Although it is a goal to NOT modify the code of any existing tests, it turns 
>> out to be reasonable to adapt some of the existing `check...` methods to use 
>> the new `OutputChecker`.  All javadoc tests pass, both locally and on all 
>> standard platforms.  Many/most uses of the existing `checkOutput` method 
>> provide "ordered" strings, and are candidates to use the new ordered check. 
>> But enough uses are _not_ ordered, so it is not reasonable to change the 
>> default at this time.  It is noted as a TODO to examine the appropriate test 
>> cases, so that we can decide whether to fix those tests and change the 
>> default.
>
> Jonathan Gibbons has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains six commits:
> 
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 
> 8273154.JavadocTester-checker
>  - Address review comments
>  - Add, `checkAnyOf`, update `checkUnique`, reformat some comments
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 
> 8273154.JavadocTester-checker
>  - Merge with upstream/master
>  - JDK-8273154: Provide a JavadocTester method for non-overlapping, unordered 
> output matching

test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/testJavadocTester/TestJavadocTester.java line 332:

> 330:     public void testComplete_Ordered() {
> 331:         messages.clear();
> 332:         // In this following calls, the strings are specified in the 
> expected order.

Should it be "these" or "the"?

test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/testJavadocTester/TestJavadocTester.java line 353:

> 351:     public void testComplete_Unordered() {
> 352:         messages.clear();
> 353:         // In this following calls, the strings are deliberately 
> specified out of the expected order.

Similarly: should it be "these" or "the"?

test/langtools/jdk/javadoc/testJavadocTester/TestJavadocTester.java line 437:

> 435:                 .toArray(String[]::new);
> 436:     }
> 437: }

Add newline.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5743

Reply via email to