Have a look at JSF and you will come fleeing back to Wicket. What Wicked gives you, that other frameworks does not, is the ability to avoid XML and use your existing HTML and Java skills. Also, it's really easy to create your own components and obtain reuse that way, something I have not seen much of elsewhere. Last but not least, Wicket's fluent interfaces are great for exploratory leaning - there's just something nice about having your IDE guide you. This is what Java does quite well. There's also Stripes but whatever you do, stay away from JSF. lol
/Casper On 3 Sep., 22:05, Lenny P <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us> wrote: > Hi Guys. > > I was there during the Roundup '07 and had a blast. > You may remember me as the pilot. > > Unfortunately, I got laid off and now programming again. > We are evailuating web frameworks (ugh) and I know from the podcast > that Dick uses Wicket. > I've noticed that there are a lot of duplication between wicket .html > and .java files, i.e. > forms are 'created' in both html and java. This seems to me a bad > duplication effort, > and introduces lots of room for errors. What do you think about this? > > Thanks! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
