why do you think we are getting the "real lambda's" with this delay? Did the scope of the lambda project change with the delay?
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Maciej Hrynczyszyn < maciej.hrynczys...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/9/8 Cédric Beust ♔ <ced...@beust.com>: > > > From Mark's post: > > > > Plan A: JDK 7 (as currently defined) Mid 2012 > > Plan B: JDK 7 (minus Lambda, Jigsaw, and part of Coin) Mid 2011 > > JDK 8 (Lambda, Jigsaw, the rest of Coin, ++) Late 2012 > > > > To me, "JDK 7 minus Lambda, Jigsaw and part of Coin" doesn't sound much > like > > "Getting Java moving again". > > Getting the real lambda is probably worth the delay. > > M, > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
