On 9 Sep., 08:47, Fabrizio Giudici <fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 9/9/10 08:30 , Karsten Silz wrote:> This may also be the final nail in the > JavaFX coffin. I remember > > hearing that JavaFX really needs Java modularity for quick > > start-up time on the desktop and in mobile to compete effectively > > against Flash. > > Yes, but this refers to a end-customer deployment. Industrial > deployments are fine as they are already fine today with regular JSE. > Of course, one might ask why an industrial customer would switch to > JavaFX, but this could be - at least in some cases - the effect of > Oracle marketing. So, I'd rather re-phrase your statement as "this > makes really harm to end-user targeting of Java/JavaFX". Which is sad, > anyway.
Agreed, deployment and start-up time are a lesser concern in such a controlled environment. Now JavaFX being a different beast than Swing, it competes against Swing, Windows, Flex/AIR and web apps in the enterprise space and is probably in the grand scheme of things the least attractive option there. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
