Not quite as seamlessly, but both Eclipse and IntelliJ now do a reasonable job of import management.
On 19 September 2010 13:57, Graham Allan <grundlefl...@googlemail.com>wrote: > You're right about that, it's not optimal, and given the choice I'd opt for > less crap. But, having said that, it's so far down the list of priorities > for > switching languages that it's not even worth mentioning. > > Out of interest, do the Scala tools (such as the Eclipse plugin) handle > imports as seemlessly as their Java counterpart? (I swear I'm going to try > some of this stuff Real Soon Now). > > Regards, > Graham > > > From: Ricky Clarkson <ricky.clark...@gmail.com> > > > > To: javaposse@googlegroups.com > > > > I agree that the metric isn't very good alone. However, I'm sure having > a > > block of crap at the top of every file that you ignore (but tools read) > > isn't optimal. Scala goes a little way to making those less necessary > to > > fold, but not all the way. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Kevin Wright mail / gtalk / msn : kev.lee.wri...@gmail.com pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
