On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot <reini...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Obviously, when sneakyThrows becomes part of the language, you remove > the compile-time restriction that you can't catch checked exceptions > that nothing in the try body throws. We're discussing an idea here, I > didn't feel the need to submit an entire spec. > Why invent "sneakyThrows" when you could just drop the checked requirement? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
