On Oct 9, 11:59 pm, Orien <orien.madgw...@gmail.com> wrote: > This second point is blatantly incorrect as the GPL v2 IS a copyright > license and includes an implicit patent grant.
How can something be both included and implicit? Either it is included (and therefore explicit) or not included (and therefore implicit, dependending on your - lawyers - interpretation). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.