This may be relevant: http://www.infoq.com/interviews/wampler-scala On 7 Jan 2011 18:06, "Russel Winder" <rus...@russel.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 17:44 +0000, Kevin Wright wrote: > [ . . . ] >> >> No way is that happening, parallel arrays were the primary driver for >> closures in java. Until we get closures, all bets are off... > > ParallelDoubleArray in extra166y works fine for me with anonymous > classes. It being Java, it's verbose and ugly, but it works -- no need > to wait for closures at all. > > I agree it would be better to have closures than not have them. > > Of course the JVM is not Java, which is why GPars, Scalaz, and Clojure > already have parallel map so that applications targeting the JVM can > have all these nice parallelism goodies today -- without having to wait > for the (potentially mythical :-) Java 7. > > -- > Russel. > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net<sip%3arussel.win...@ekiga.net> > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
