I'm not really worried if someone's an MVP or a JC, but prefer the JavaPosse as the guys (bar Joe) are all active developers so for me makes a better conversation. They are different formats of course - I know the posse sometimes do interviews, but that's all dotnetrocks do. The problem can be that dnr interviews turn into a 30/40 minute sales pitch about the latest (generally) Microsoft product.
There are other .NET podcasts which are a little more comparable with the Posse - one I listen to is HerdingCode, which is again mostly interviews, but they are typically more critical of MS and have a lot more interviews with open source / non-MS topics. On Feb 7, 10:48 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > MVP's (Most Valuable Professional) vs. JC's (Java Champions) are not > that different conceptually though, the former perhaps being more > formalized and common - I seem to remember there are only about 100 > JC's in the world which is not a lot out of 5-10 mio. developers. > > On Feb 7, 8:06 am, ScottHK <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The culture gap was obvious and hilarious and starting from the > > introduction! > > Java posse mentioned other hobbies including...ahem, Microsoft guys > > cataloged their "Most Valuable Person" credentials.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
