I think Tapestry & Wicket use valid templates.
Moandji
--
www.moandjiezana.com
Sent from my phone
On 19 Feb 2011 04:34, "Reinier Zwitserloot" <reini...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Build an entire website as one big flash plugin?
>
> Well, ask Gizmodo about how that sort of thing flies. Or rather, ask their
> user numbers. They really got trounced - moved to a single page model
(with
> a HTML anchor and a bunch of ajax calls actually downloading content and
> rendering it - which is the kind of model GWT is good at, though you don't
> *HAVE* to do it that way with GWT), and their reader numbers nosedived to
> barely a quarter*.
>
> I'm inclined to disregard OP's research until OP explains why 'rails is
> currently not compatible with the way the web world works'. I don't
> particularly like rails either, but clearly this statement is false.
>
>
> As a total aside, does anyone know of a template system that is 100%
'valid'
> HTML, with 'valid' defined properly (as in, works in all browsers, not
> 'conforms to spec')? Template languages often involve {} or <%> or other
> constructs that don't look anything like HTML, but its theoretically
> possible to do something like this:
>
> <t:loop key="itemsInCart">
> <table ....>
> <t:iteration><tr><td><t:value
> key="itemName">Doohickey</t:value></td>....
>
>
> and so on. Should be even more compatible with dreamweaver and such than
> anything else, and has the considerable advantage of rendering just right
in
> a browser without applying the template. One major issue with it is that
I'd
> consider 'include / frame' a primitive (i.e. crucial core feature) of any
> template system and that's a lot harder to express like that. You really
> need some sort of server program, even if only run locally, to apply
those.
>
>
>
> *) This *MIGHT* be due to the way it was measured, i.e. navigating on the
> page doesn't visit new URLs, just changes the URL hash and makes more ajax
> requests. There was without a doubt quite a storm from a few dedicated
> gizmodo users that they didn't like it at all though. Also I regrettably
> can't find a link the chart, so, salt, grain, etc.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
