2011/3/30 Cédric Beust ♔ <ced...@beust.com> > The code is working as expected but when you are talking about API's > exposed in an entire operating system, it's not very hard for me to imagine > that there might be a lot of pieces that need to be refactored and > documented before I want to expose them to hundreds of thousands of > developers. There are also parts that you will want to remove or obfuscate, > you will need to create a specific OS distribution, transfer from one repo > to another, etc...
Didn't Rubin say it was because they had taken "shortcuts" that made it difficult to get Honeycomb running on phones? Seems a little odd, since that's a big part of what the whole Fragments API was about. Chris Koerner > I don't see why Google felt the need to rush Honeycomb at all. So what if > they waited another year. Better to release a full and complete Tablet OS > than to rush it, imho. I'm sure the Open Handset Alliance members applied a lot of pressure to get it out as fast as possible. Waiting another year while another 30-40 million iPads are sold doesn't sound like a great idea. Moandji -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.