I don't have to resist. JUnit is to TestNG as Eclipse is to IDEA; basically, JUnit manages to steal stuff from TestNG that they think is easiest to implement, except they release it a long time after TestNG has had it. TestNG and JUnit are similar in that they both do unit testing, but JUnit 4 is a piece d'crap compared to TestNG.
I'm exaggerating, of course. In reality, JUnit isn't even THAT good. 2011/6/6 Cédric Beust ♔ <ced...@beust.com>: > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:31 AM, phil swenson <phil.swen...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I think Eclipse is fairly awful (usability mostly). But I'm curious >> what you think is wrong with JUnit? > > Must... resist... > -- > Cédric > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
