On 17 June 2011 20:33, Fabrizio Giudici <fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it>wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 06:49 PM, Kevin Wright wrote: > >> >> >> Agreed :) >> >> Phrases like "callback style" or even just "asynchronous" would probably >> be more useful in this context, as they better reflect the intent of the >> code. >> >> A few days ago I updated the draft to just call for "similarities" with > continuations (and that the design is "inspired" by CPS). Given that you're > there, a final question: should I put an UML stereotype to my callback > classes, do you think <<continuation>> would be wrong? At this point, I > think it would be imprecise. Probably <<callback>> is better. > > > "1842 - Ada Lovelace writes the first program. She is hampered in her efforts by the minor inconvenience that she doesn't have any actual computers to run her code. Enterprise architects will later relearn her techniques in order to program in UML." http://james-iry.blogspot.com/2009/05/brief-incomplete-and-mostly-wrong.html > > -- > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." > java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people > fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it > > -- Kevin Wright gtalk / msn : kev.lee.wri...@gmail.com <kev.lee.wri...@gmail.com>mail: kevin.wri...@scalatechnology.com vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright twitter: @thecoda "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger" ~ Dijkstra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
