On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Josh Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
> That said, even with that, there tends to be more boilerplate in statically > typed languages than in > dynamic. > Still not seeing it, unless you get more specific. I would agree with: "There tends to be more boiler plate in statically typed languages that don't support type inference than dynamic languages". But as soon as a statically typed language supports type inference, I'm really not convinced that it has more boiler plate than a dynamically typed language (obviously, type annotations don't count as "boiler plate", we're talking about things such as "List l = new ArrayList()"). -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
