You guys are talking about JSF 1 ? I thought only JSF 1 was terrible. But JSF 2 isn't. But then again, I never used JSF.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Brian Smith <bmjsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, shipping an application with JSF included generally works fine. We > have a number of deployments on different Tomcat versions, and test a lot > on Jetty too. > > It does get problematic when you're trying to ship the same war to clients > using different containers, where some are full EE and some only servlet > spec. You will find you can't easily configure some of the full EE > containers to do child first or isolated classloading so you get version > incompatibilities when they also provide JSF. > > I'd echo Matthew's comments on JSF and Richfaces in general, we consider > it legacy and won't be using it for anything new. > > regards > > Brian > > > On 29 November 2012 20:32, Matthew Farwell <matthewjfarw...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Yes, I've done this, using JSF/Richfaces, deployed to Tomcat. Tomcat is >> the standard for this particular client, and this application was one of a >> number of JSF applications deployed on Tomcat. This was an internal >> intranet application, which wasn't exposed to the internet. >> >> Apart from not liking the technology and having lots of problems to do >> with the jsf lifecycle and its interaction with Richfaces, it's been >> reliable enough in production. >> >> Matthew Farwell. >> >> On Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:34:34 UTC+1, Jan Goyvaerts wrote: >>> >>> It has been brought to my attention it is possible to deploy a war file >>> including a complete JSF implementation. On a server actually not >>> containing any JSF libraries. I always thought it was mandatory to deploy >>> your JSF application on a JSF-compliant application server. >>> >>> Checking the questions on SO, it looks like people are actually doing >>> this on Tomcat and Jetty. >>> >>> I was wondering whether this is standard practice. And whether it is >>> reliable. >>> >>> Does anybody in here have practical experience with this ? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Java Posse" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/javaposse/-/SxJ_tXTJlZ0J. >> >> To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
