On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Fabrizio Giudici <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:10:32 +0200, Josh Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  So, unfortunately, Shotwell does not do this.  As you said, it really only
>> sorts by date.  Really the only major advantage it has, is being
>> preinstalled on Ubuntu.
>>
>
> Shotwell is extremely poor - and some decent capability of browsing your
> catalog, as in your examples, is fundamental if you shot even moderate
> quantities of photos. In ten years of digital (right in these days, BTW),
> I've built up a collection of more than 30,000 photos (one third should be
> pruned, I've accumulated some delay) and you risk to be unable to find
> stuff when you search for it.
>
>
To be fair, most of my needs are met by it.  No matter how limited.  I have
a fair number of pictures for the past few years, but I'm more than good
with just casual browsing of my catalog.  And, honestly, I just need
something to help run a basic photo album style software.  Preferably with
archive features.  Right now my main machine is a laptop that I've landed
on from a bike wreck.



> First, group shoots by subject - I often do many shots in a few
> seconds/minutes of some subjects, slightly changing the composition. When I
> have to shoot hand-held and I have no time for the tripod, I repeat some
> shots to be able to pick the sharpest one (this is done by side-to-side
> comparation and Lightroom has a "Compare" function for this). I would
> really like to have a feature that gives an automated rating for the
> sharpness - probably you still need to go manually for picking the best,
> but a function to spot shots with blatant motion blur would be helpful for
> a gross pruning.
>


>
> Then I apply some presets to batch of photos (contrast/clarity,
> saturation, sharpness, lens defect correction) - some parameters are
> automatic (such as lens correction, with the exception for fish-eye
> lenses), in other cases I use a sample photo in a set for fine tune and
> then I apply cut & paste of settings to others - clearly non-destructive
> editing is fundamental here. Pruning is done in multiple passes, usually
> halving the set in the first two rounds. At the third / fourth round I
> usually am able to give positive ratings to half of photos and pick those
> for publishing. For the other half, I have to resume the process several
> weeks later - I realized that I'm much more objective in judging the
> quality when some time has passed from the shot time - probably because the
> brain is still reconstructing the scene from other sources bound to the
> fact that "you was there".
>
> For the rest of metadata - geotagging is done immediately, by means of a
> plugin that pairs the shooting time with the GPS recorded track of the
> trip. For tags, my workflow is insufficient - I apply them later, but I've
> accumulated a good bunch of delay here.
>
> Note that the workflow basically never ends. Even months and years later I
> find myself going randomly on old shoots, changing ratings, improving the
> post-processing.
>

So, yeah, that is a much more involved process than what I do.  My only aim
is to have pictures I took up on Facebook relatively quickly.  I would like
a process where I get some printed on a more regular basis, but I'm
essentially your prototypical amateur that has a few good prime lenses and
a solid flash.  Might take more pictures as my kids get older and in to any
hobbies.


>
> For what concerns publishing, I've written my own little CMS with specific
> support for publishing photos, which needs to be just published in a folder
> (I mean, no database). I use the "Publish services" of Lightroom,
> publishing to disk (Lightroom detects automatically when you have retouched
> a photo after the latest publishing), and then rsync to copy them to my
> server.



Just curious, what features drove the creation of your own CMS?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java 
Posse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to