On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 22:22:05 +0100, Ricky Clarkson
<[email protected]> wrote:
I had some pretty good experiences with Jersey a year ago. It's quite
simple, mostly annotation-based and iirc fails in readable ways when you
get things wrong. We were also using Spring MVC on the same project,
which
seemed horrendous in terms of failure messages.
I've been fine with both. In the end I prefer Spring if it's used also for
other things, because I can get rid of Jersey and have one less library.
The Jersey client (2.0) is quite nice to use.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s.
"We make Java work. Everywhere."
http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog - [email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java
Posse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
