Ok, now i know the reason is why declaring a field in the subclass with the same name as the one in the superclass, it is not recommended. So the conclusion when we doing that will make the stuff "*confusing*" and "*useless*". am i right? Btw, thank you for your time to share me what y'all already know about this.
Best regards, M. Ghazali a.k.a ghaNOZ 2480 ================== Blog: Catatan Online ghaNOZ 2480 http://ghanoz2480.wordpress.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/people/Ghanoz-Ghazali-Emce/1003026334 ================== --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaprogrammingwithpassion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
