Yes, using the same name, would only get things confusing. However, I'm not sure when you would need to do that... Probably if you need to "redefine" an attribute with a different type.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:00 AM, ghanoz 2480 <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, now i know the reason is why declaring a field in the subclass with the > same name as the one in the > superclass, it is not recommended. So the conclusion when we doing that > will make the stuff "*confusing*" and "*useless*". am i right? > Btw, thank you for your time to share me what y'all already know about > this. > > Best regards, > M. Ghazali a.k.a ghaNOZ 2480 > > > ================== > Blog: > Catatan Online ghaNOZ 2480 > http://ghanoz2480.wordpress.com > > Facebook: > http://www.facebook.com/people/Ghanoz-Ghazali-Emce/1003026334 > ================== > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaprogrammingwithpassion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
