On 12/20/01 11:51 AM, "bob mcwhirter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, James Strachan wrote: > >> Agreed; though if you install Ant properly then you can just type >> >> ant >> >> or >> >> ant.sh >> >> So maybe we don't really need build.[sh|bat] at all? > > How many folks have installed Ant properly? How many folks have > installed the -correct- version of Ant properly? I thought the same with velocity when we switched and took ant out of build/lib (our /lib) and required 1.4, and it went a lot better than I thought it would. It's actually not a problem - there never has been one complaint after the initial surprised, and I just made sure all the docs said the right things. Developers will have ant, or should :) > > I'm not amongst those who have. I still prefer the nice, self-contained, > no dependency distribution of putting ant.jar in lib/, and bootstrapping > with a script. It is easier. I am neutral, but I know that not having it included is ok - it works. But no big deal. > Maybe when ant 2.0 comes up, and folks standardize, we can stop > doing that. But until then, I think scripts would be good. > > -bob > > > _______________________________________________ > Jaxen-interest mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jaxen-interest -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Jaxen-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jaxen-interest
