> Yeah, I was taking another look at it again myself today. It would
> require significant work on Saxpath as well as Jaxen. But it would be
> cool to do ;) But what package would it go in? I don't think it will
> really be able to share much code with the XPath 1.0 implementation.
>
> org.saxpath2 ?
> org.saxpath.xpath2 ?
>
> org.jaxen.xpath2 ?
>
> Is it too late to move everything in org.jaxen and sub-packages into
> org.jaxen.xpath ? Hehe...
Way back when I first started the project, I had org.saxpath.v1.*
and org.jaxen.v1.* to map to XPath 1.0 spec. James talked me out
of it. BLAME HIM. ;)
Nah, I figure we'll just have a root of org.saxpath.v2.* and
org.jaxen.v2.*.
-bob
_______________________________________________
Jaxen-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jaxen-interest
