> > I've actually been working on an extension of Jaxen's XPath > > implementation to implement XPointer. This is partly where I'm coming > > from with regards to Function extensions and naming conventions. Once > > I've stabilised it a bit, I'll send it in to ya'll. I've currently got > > it in the org.jaxen.xpointer package. Is that ok with you, Bob and > > James?
+1 > I guess we could start adding sub packages inside org.jaxen.function for > stuff, like function.xslt, function.xpointer function.ext and so forth. +1 -bob _______________________________________________ Jaxen-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jaxen-interest