> > I've actually been working on an extension of Jaxen's XPath
> > implementation to implement XPointer. This is partly where I'm coming
> > from with regards to Function extensions and naming conventions. Once
> > I've stabilised it a bit, I'll send it in to ya'll. I've currently got
> > it in the org.jaxen.xpointer package. Is that ok with you, Bob and
> > James?

+1

> I guess we could start adding sub packages inside org.jaxen.function for
> stuff, like function.xslt, function.xpointer function.ext and so forth.

+1

        -bob


_______________________________________________
Jaxen-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jaxen-interest

Reply via email to