I easily integrated .NET 3.5 (also .NET 2.0) with jBASE 4.0 by
altering some registry entries and folder names. I bet jBASE 3.4 could
be integrated in the same way.

On Feb 24, 7:45 pm, Richard Kann <h...@comp-ware.net> wrote:
> Tony,
>
> You can load .net 1.1 on the same system that has .net 2.0 or 3.0. It
> allows all to be present on the same system. Just the sdk is 1.1 but I
> beleive there is no higher rev on the sdk.
>
> Richard
>
> Tony G wrote:
> > Always great to see your name Richard.  I hope all is well.
>
> > Well, I was afraid of this.  With some careful manipulation of
> > registry and environment variables I think I can support both
> > v3.4.9 and v3.4.10 on a single system.  But loading .NET v1.1 SDK
> > onto a system that already has all of the other higher .NET
> > releases isn't a good idea.
>
> > Source isn't shipped with our utilities and to my knowledge jBase
> > doesn't support a way to securely deploy a package with source
> > that gets injected into the compiler (no MV DBMS does but I
> > really wish they did!).  So we need to deploy object-only and it
> > looks like our download page simply needs to separate out each
> > supported jBase release.
>
> > Unless someone has a better idea, I'll reinstall each release
> > into separate vmWare environments.
>
> > Thanks again,
> > T
>
> >> From: Richard Kann
>
> >> Actually 3.4.10 and the earlier releases are different
> >> object code. I discovered that the hard way.
>
> >> Richard Kann
>
> >> Simon Verona wrote:
>
> >>> Tony
>
> >>> I don't know a great deal about 4.1 so my comments
> >>> relate to 3.4 only.
>
> >>> MingW is included with the 3.4 release as a "free"
> >>> compiler.   I wouldn't use this though, and the
> >>> preferred option is the Microsoft DotNet compiler
> >>> (just install the Full DotNet 1.1 SDK available from
> >>> the Microsoft web site - use 1.1 and not one of the
> >>> later versions).  I believe the release notes state
> >>> that MingW is not for "production" use (though I could
> >>> be wrong).
>
> >>> I believe that in general the object code produced is
> >>> compatible with any 3.4 system (though I'm never fully
> >>> convinced and always ship source code and compile on
> >>> the target system before automatically deleting it).
>
> >>> Beyond that I can't think of anything that would cause
> >>> you problems - unless you've used some functionality
> >>> that is specific to 4.1 and not available in 3.4 (but
> >>> I'm sure that the compiler and some testing would
> >>> easily identify these).
>
> >>> HTH
>
> >>> Simon
>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Tony G
>
> >>> We have requests for NebulaXLite (rich Excel
> >>> spreadsheets from BASIC) on v3.4 for Windows but the
> >>> original build was done on v4.1 for Windows.  I moved
> >>> the accounts to the target system and executed
> >>> UpdateMD.  I can see all files and compile programs.  
> >>> It looks like it's ready to go.
>
> >>> As expected, LISTF shows some files as type J4, and
> >>> I'm wondering if there is anything lingering in this
> >>> environment that might cause grief.  I especially
> >>> don't want to give clients a full account for
> >>> installation and cause them grief with a v3/4 hybrid.
> >>> If required I could easily just create accounts in v3,
> >>> move code over, and not confuse it with anything from
> >>> v4.
>
> >>> The 4.1 system had Java and VC++ but the 3.4 system
> >>> has no Java but does have mingw.  Because of this an
> >>> error is displayed for %JRELIB% in jDiag, but I think
> >>> this can be ignored.  No?
>
> >>> Can I expect object-only code that is generated in
> >>> this environment to work in any target 3.4 system?  
> >>> Would there be a mingw/VC++ issue?  Does it matter if
> >>> this is 3.4.10 and some targets are 3.4.9?
>
> >>> Thank you kindly.
>
> >>> Tony Gravagno
> >>> TG@ nospamNebula-RnD.com
> >>> Nebula R&D sells mv.NET and other developer utilities
>
> > worldwide
>
> >>> and provides related development services
>
> >>> Many articles of interest to jBase developers:
> >>>   no!spamNebula-RnD.com/blog
> >>> Enquiries about NebulaXLite for jBase v3,4,5 welcome:    
> >>>   removeNebula-RnD.com/products/xlite.htm
> >>> Visit PickWiki.com !

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please read the posting guidelines at: 
http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE/web/Posting%20Guidelines

IMPORTANT: Type T24: at the start of the subject line for questions specific to 
Globus/T24

To post, send email to jBASE@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to jbase-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jBASE?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to