Hey, I'm neither marc or rickard but.. On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Tommy Hellstr�m wrote: > JTS. Isn't JTS required in a J2EE implementation? The current spec does not require JTS. It recommends RMI-IIOP as the EJB server interoperability protocol and OMG's OTS as means to propagate transactions which JTS is an implementation of. Recommends. > Isn't JTS required to be able > to communicate with other's TM's? It's a possibility. But I suppose there would be other options as well. -- Juha
- [jBoss-Dev] Transactions, please! Aaron Mulder
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions, please! marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions, please! Justin Forder
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions, please! Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions, please! marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions, please... Tommy Hellstr�m
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions, pl... Juha-P Lindfors
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions, pl... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions... Tommy Hellstr�m
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions... Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions... Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions... Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions... Tommy Hellstr�m
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Transactions... Rickard �berg
