Yo
marc fleury wrote:
> I think I kinda see the need for a non-distributed implementation of full
> JTA and needed TS. It would need to be pluggable just like the other
> "services" to the container right now.
Alright.
> If we do non distributed we can make a fast stand alone server. I mean
> people don't really use web transactions that well right now, and so first
> they need to learn them, and then we might see a need to actually distribute
> the transaction (and do all the fancy Propagation of Context she refers
> too).
>
> In short, writing that simple interface for pluggability, (we need the
> thread association methods and no they are not resume and suspend ;-) is
> trivial.
Hm.. why are they not resume and suspend? I got the impression from
reading the Javadocs of javax.transaction.TransactionManager that this
is indeed the purpose of those two methods. What have I missed? What are
they used for then?
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
