----- Original Message -----
From: Rickard �berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: jBoss Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] rmi,transactions,orbs [was: TransactionImpl]
>> 6) Most orbs offer another services (persistence, events, security) which
>> are pertinent to ejb containers implementations.
> I think we are better off by doing persistence and security ourselves.
> Events is provide by SpyderMQ.
Altough I'm not completely sure about how tighly coupled are persistence and
security with jBoss but, if they are plug-able (which is the right word?), I
could say that more choices don't hurt ()
>> 7) The corba component model is a more robust ground for a ejb container
>> implementation
> Hm.. more robust ground than.. what?
Perhaps this is a matter of taste but I think about it this way:
There are several orb implementations, so there are (some) experience in the
field and more choices.
The orb (and services, etc) design and standarization is a thoughtful and
long process
Orb are cospicuous, so they are tested in more scenarios.
>> and the way to align with it (not necessarily now and
>> possibly never!) is building it on top of a corba (2.3 or 3? we surely
need
>> a POA) orb.
> I don't mind plugging in a ORB for the distribution of the container,
> but does it have to be more tightly coupled than that?
Right now, I think that plugging it using the JMX machinery should be
enough.
Do you have another kind of solution in mind?
>/Rickard
Carlos
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
