Rickard �berg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Tibor F�ldes wrote:
> > I am nes here and i like what you are done !
> >
> > But i am a little bit worried about some licence problems are mentioned
> > in this artikel
> > http://java.oreilly.com/news/j2ee_0700.html
>
> What license problems are you referring to? I could find any mention of
> such in this article.
Sorry it was in the reactions on the enhydra mailing list.
It is about the question , is anyway permitted an open source ejb server
without java licensing ? In your lib directory are jars of SUN is it legal
?
I dont know this only a question ?
>
>
> > What is your opinion about this artikel anyway ?
>
> As always our friend Brett tends to get a tad dramatic ;-)
>
> However, if you read between the lines, all he really says is: THINK!
> Consider your needs, consider your options, and make an educated action.
> Can't argue there really.
>
> IMHO however, I think that if we can get the J2EE scene rocking *there
> will be* interesting synergy effects in terms of components being
> created in one place and then used for other things. That's what I am
> hoping for anyway, and J2EE+OpenSource is a way to speed up this
> process. And there's no way that can happen without a component
> architecture, and J2EE (and EJB especially), is the only way to get to
> that point IMnsHO.
I hope it too !
The question is anyway : is really so much more effort component based
programming as this from Brett proposed servlet+jdbc .
Is not ejb is exactly what a business object must do when it works in a
really business application wich is not only a publishing some data and
gathering some restricted amount of reactions .
Tibor
