> No, the protocol support is not just an implementation issue. Which > protocol should the getEJBObject() value support? Sorry, won't work. Ok rickard, let's not waste each other time today. You can travel the CI with the MI and implement the getEJBObject from the context accordingly. It is even pretty straightforward. Small implementation, but completely an implementation issue. marc > > /Rickard > > -- > Rickard �berg > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.telkel.com > http://www.jboss.org > http://www.dreambean.com > >
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Joel Shellman
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadat... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Sebastien Alborini
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] EjbRefMetadata broken Jeremiah Johnson
