marc fleury wrote:
> > No, the protocol support is not just an implementation issue. Which
> > protocol should the getEJBObject() value support? Sorry, won't work.
> 
> Ok rickard, let's not waste each other time today.  You can travel the CI
> with the MI and implement the getEJBObject from the context accordingly.  It
> is even pretty straightforward.  Small implementation, but completely an
> implementation issue.

Give it some thought. It's not an implementation issue.

/Rickard

-- 
Rickard �berg

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com

Reply via email to