At 15:28 3.9.2000 +0200, you wrote: >> Now instead we're plugging in JMS as an afterthough for EJB 2.0. > >"instead"? Not following. I meant that JMS as part of the architecture seems to be dragging behind. Everyone knows about it and agrees it does neat stuff but no one quite seems to know where to put it in good use. This is the feeling I got when I glanced through the message bean stuff. It's kinda odd, really. Not sure why that is. Maybe messaging is just too mundane :) -- Juha
- [jBoss-Dev] Two More Thoughts Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Two More Thoughts Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Two More Thoughts Juha Lindfors
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Two More Thoughts Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Two More Thoughts Juha Lindfors
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Two More Thoughts marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Two More Thoughts Juha Lindfors
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Two More Thoughts marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Two More Thoughts marc fleury
- [jBoss-Dev] More JMX Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] More JMX Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] More JMX Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] More JMX Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] More JMX Rob Castaneda
- Re[2]: [jBoss-Dev] More JMX Oleg Nitz
