> Maybe, maybe not. To build it on top of the JMS engine, yes, but not
> necessarily by using the JMS API. Might be overkill.
Don't buy into the spiel ;-) the JMS API is very lightweight, it is a
programmatic issue (start connection, stop connection) not a "speed" one...
it might be easy to program what we need in the JMX callbacks ;-) if we
don't have a chicken and egg problem, for the rest it will be easier to
maintain one distribution of spyderMQ, imho.
marc
>
> > And since the server is
> > built on top of the JMX framework it leads to it having a very robust
> > messaging system at its very core (nice for logging etc etc).
>
> True.
>
> > Now instead we're plugging in JMS as an afterthough for EJB 2.0.
>
> "instead"? Not following.
>
> /Rickard
>
> --
> Rickard �berg
>
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.telkel.com
> http://www.jboss.org
> http://www.dreambean.com
>
>
>
