Hey
I want feedback on two issues brought up yesterday: , and use of java:
namespace
1. Configuration files
Currently it is possible to have several jBoss configurations by
copying/renaming jboss.conf/jboss.jcml to whatever.conf/whatever.jcml
(as outlined yesterday). A better idea (IMHO) would be to put each
configuration in a separate directory, i.e. "/conf/default/jboss.conf"
and "/conf/mysettings/jboss.conf". This would make it easier to code
services(=the filename is always the same and can be accessed through
Class.getResource), easier to administrate (copy "conf/default" and
you're good to go), and easier to understand (again, because the names
of the conf files are always the same).
So, is it a good idea to have directory-prefixed configurations instead
of filename-prefixed configurations? May I have your vote please.
2. Today everything is bound into the default JNDI namespace. The
drawback of this is that many (almost all actually) of the things that
are bound have no meaning outside of the JVM, such as connection pools,
security managers, transaction manager etc. I propose that they be moved
to the VM-local "java:/" namespace. This would require changing the
binding and the lookup places, but all in all that should be pretty
minor.
Does this seem like a good idea? May I have your vote please.
regards,
Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
