Hey,
> "Bordet, Simone" wrote:
> > it should be:
> >
> > public boolean isActive(Object id)
> > {
> > // Check whether an object with the given id is
> available in the
> > cache
> > boolean isActive;
> > synchronized (getCacheLock())
> > {
> > isActive = getCache().peek(id) != null;
> > }
> > return isActive;
> > }
>
> True, but this check is so fragile anyway
WDYM ? If not sync'ed this may not tell you if id is really in the cache.
> (regardless of how one does
> it) that I think unsynched is ok.
>
> YMMV.
Yeah, MMMV, but unsync'ed isn't OK...
Simon
