> And by the way, it doesn't look like you tagged the existing code > or made a branch, either. Was the desire for that not made adequately > clear? The desire for a tag was for the EJX change, and I will do that then. The config change was big, but manageable. The EJX change is much much bigger. /Rickard
- [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration schem... Rickard Oberg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme Aaron Mulder
- [jBoss-Dev] Project Guidelines Rickard Oberg
- [jBoss-Dev] Project Guidelines Filip Hanik
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme Maddison, David
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme Schaefer, Andreas
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme Schaefer, Andreas
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme Rickard �berg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration scheme marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration schem... Rickard Oberg
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] New configuration ... marc fleury
