I would be more than happy, if I could be of help in your operation. Please
let me know accordingly...
Thanks
-Manish
> -----Original Message-----
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:56 PM
> To: jBoss Developer
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] jndi/UserTransaction
>
>
> Hello,
>
> sorry for the delay I am finally out of the water re website
> (well almost).
>
> I am very interested in a integration of
> a/new TM or extended TM
> b/ Jeremie from France Telecom... it is the new JOnAS TM and
> I believe we
> can buy ourselves distributed TM with it.
>
> let me know if you time/energy/will to take that on. To be
> quite frank I am
> thinking b/ first then talk to ole on possibilities for a/,
>
> marc
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sethi , Manish
> |Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 7:51 AM
> |To: 'jBoss Developer '
> |Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] jndi/UserTransaction
> |
> |
> |Hi Everybody,
> |
> |Writing very first mail to the group.
> |
> |I have gone through present implementation og JTA. I want to
> help in it's
> |development. Now what I want to know is what should we choose out of
> |followings for this job.
> |
> |1. Should we implement JTS/OTS specs at the back. (Probably we
> |would have to
> |start form scrach...)
> |
> |OR
> |
> |2. Should we think of some mechanism of just making TXContext
> |movable around
> |the multiple JVM...
> |
> |
> |-Manish
> |
> |
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: marc fleury
> |To: jBoss Developer
> |Sent: 1/12/01 10:34 AM
> |Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] jndi/UserTransaction
> |
> ||Is there a known historical fix for this, such as substituting a
> |different
> ||JTA implementation or JNDI implementation? That is, has
> someone already
> |
> |hi,
> |
> |the jndi implementation is an orthogonal issue. We need to plug in a
> |distributed monitor (JTS/JTA) and hook it up to jndi. The plumbing
> |(propagation, thread association) is already there as it is an
> |adaptation of
> |the old jboss1.0 code.
> |
> |For the record, jboss1.0 used JOnAS distributed TM to provide
> |distributed
> |transactions. We deliberately removed it from 2.0 to
> provide fast in VM
> |tm.
> |
> |Plugging a new TM is what is needed.
> |
> |marc
> |
> |
> ||provided this functionality in the past and able to offer
> suggestions?
> ||Distributed JTA and UserTransaction access by remote clients
> ||through JNDI is
> ||spec-required.
> ||
> ||Sean
> ||
> ||on 1/11/01 11:17 PM, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ||
> ||> userTransaction is for beans right now. I.e visible in
> JNDI of beans,
> |but
> ||> NOT the globla JNDI.
> ||>
> ||> marc
> ||>
> ||>
> ||> |-----Original Message-----
> ||> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Scott M Stark
> ||> |Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 8:08 PM
> ||> |To: jBoss Developer
> ||> |Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] jndi/UserTransaction
> ||> |
> ||> |
> ||> |Can't you just access it via the context.getUserTransaction()
> |method?
> ||> |It is bound under java:comp/UserTransaction, but this is only
> |available
> ||> |from within the EJB while the container is executing a
> method. Its
> ||> |not visable vie jndiView.
> ||> |
> ||> |
> ||> |----- Original Message -----
> ||> |From: "Peter Braswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ||> |To: "jBoss Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ||> |Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 7:20 PM
> ||> |Subject: [jBoss-Dev] jndi/UserTransaction
> ||> |
> ||> |
> ||> |> All,
> ||> |>
> ||> |> I don't see (jndiView) where the a UserTransaction is
> ||> |> bound. I didn't find in the mail archives or docs
> ||> |> anything indicating how this gets bound...
> ||> |>
> ||> |> Any hints?
> ||> |>
> ||> |> peter
> ||> |>
> ||> |> __________________________________________________
> ||> |> Do You Yahoo!?
> ||> |> Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
> ||> |> http://photos.yahoo.com/
> ||> |>
> ||> |>
> ||> |
> ||> |
> ||> |
> ||>
> ||>
> ||
> ||
> ||
> |
> |
> |
>
>
