This would be unnecessary redundance IMHO. The information is available from
CVS already so it's duplication in the source files (where it can actually
obscure the source if it is longer than the source itself) isn't a great
idea.

Nevertheless you do have a valid point about having access to a file's
history when one makes changes/track bugs/whatever. In this case I'd suggest
the problem is with CVS clients. None is designed to cache the history
information locally as they do the sources (better still they would allow
you to select files you want the history for). I can only get the log info
with jCVS for instance when I am online and connected. Doing this and saving
to file for key files is probably a good enough workaround for the moment
(you can select a number of files and get a single file with all their
histories in it).

oing forward, perhaps a note to the jCVS team/list ?. Or we can fix it
[jCVS] since the feature would solve a problem for us...

Cheers!,

Micheal


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury
> Sent: 11 February 2001 19:20
> To: jBoss Developer
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:
> jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejbMethodInvocation.java
>
>
> well the point is that it would be in the source files.
>
> If I am working on some source I want to know the changes at once.
>
> $Log$ provides that right?
>
> marc
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ole Husgaard
> |Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 7:43 PM
> |To: jBoss Developer
> |Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:
> |jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejbMethodInvocation.java
> |
> |
> |Hi,
> |
> |We already keep track of this in CVS.
> |
> |The question is: Should we duplicate
> |this in the source files?
> |
> |I don't think it's a good idea when
> |we already have this information in
> |CVS.
> |
> |
> |Best Regards,
> |
> |Ole Husgaard.
> |
> |
> |marc fleury wrote:
> |>
> |> It is important for another reason though, we will soon need to
> |keep track
> |> of what was done and by who in the container
> |>
> |> marc
> |>
> |> |-----Original Message-----
> |> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott M Stark
> |> |Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 3:19 PM
> |> |To: jBoss Developer
> |> |Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:
> |> |jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejbMethodInvocation.java
> |> |
> |> |
> |> |The $Log$ tag is way too verbose and redudant. The ContainerFactory
> |> |already has 63 changes which are 1/3 of the current lines and
> |half of the
> |> |words.
> |> |
> |> |778>cvs log ContainerFactory.java  | wc
> |> |    319    1842   14167
> |> |779>wc ContainerFactory.java
> |> |    863    2515   31840 ContainerFactory.java
> |> |
> |> |----- Original Message -----
> |> |From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |> |To: "jBoss Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |> |Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 2:50 PM
> |> |Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:
> |> |jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejbMethodInvocation.java
> |> |
> |> |
> |> |> Ok that's it then...
> |> |>
> |> |> We just need to put $Log$ at the end of our files?
> |> |>
> |> |> marc
> |> |>
> |> |>
> |> |> |-----Original Message-----
> |> |> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> |> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lennart
> |Petersson
> |> |> |Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 2:51 PM
> |> |> |To: jBoss Developer
> |> |> |Subject: Re: [jBoss-Dev] CVS update:
> |> |> |jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejbMethodInvocation.java
> |> |> |
> |> |> |
> |> |> |We are using the $Log$ tag at the end of the file as a standard and
> |> |> |works ok.
> |> |> |<snip from file>
> |> |> |/**
> |> |> | * $Log: SalesTransBean.java,v $
> |> |> | * Revision 1.6  2000/11/23 15:04:09  lepe
> |> |> | * Added first support for ECSService
> |> |> | *
> |> |> | * Revision 1.5  2000/11/01 14:25:42  lepe
> |> |> | * Blah...
> |> |> |<snip>
> |> |> | * Revision 1.1.1.1  2000/09/11 07:13:35  lepe
> |> |> | * initial import into CVS
> |> |> | */
> |> |> |/Lennart
> |> |> |
> |> |>
> |> |>
> |> |
> |> |
> |
>


Reply via email to