Hi,
> No you haven't afaik it is the "scsl" right? and you have rights to work
on
> a research mode. FYI we are working with SUN to solve the licensing
issues.
>
> I would like "licensing" discussions to not pre-empt technical ones (even
> though they are very valid ;-). I would like for the merits of JINI to be
> discussed independently and then we will put "licensing" in... :)
>
Good point. I agree, I was just getting afraid that licensing would
be so complex that it would act like "veto" to whole thing.
Richard kindly pointed me to jini-users mailing list archive, there
were helpful discussions there. After reading those, I don't see
any bigger problems with licenses - although there seems to be
some paperwork & testing required with Sun on commercial use it
is just paperwork - no megabucks of cash transferred!
Ari S.
