> It is beta.
>
> I will fix the names, it seems to be confusing everyone.
In fact, I had read about the 2.1-2.2 naming scheme a la Linux but the
homepage made me thing as if it was a final release and not a beta...
I am still confused about the config files anyway.
Cheers,
Sacha
> Today:
>
> move CVS over to sourceforge, take it from there for the tagging and such.
>
> marc
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sacha Labourey
> |Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 11:55 AM
> |To: Jboss-Dev
> |Subject: [jBoss-Dev] JBoss 2.1 has been released ?!?
> |
> |
> |Hello,
> |
> |JBoss web site indicates (http://www.jboss.org/business/binary.html) that
> |version 2.1 has just been released (homepage : JBoss 2.1 released Rickard
> |Oberg finds time to package the latest 2.1 version for all to
> download. Go
> |check it out here" ... "JBoss 2.1 is our current version")
> |
> |Nevertheless, I have never heard of such a release (shouldn't
> the final be
> |2.2?) and after downloading it, it seems to be an old version
> (with the old
> |configuration file scheme).
> |
> |Have I missed something? Is this really the newest stable relese?
> |
> |Cheers,
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | Sacha
> |
> |
>
>
>
