OK.
The timeline of 18:00 GMT is confirmed.
Simon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: mercoledì 4 aprile 2001 16:09
> To: Bordet, Simone; JBoss Development Mailing List (E-mail)
> Cc: 'Ken Jenks'
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: JBoss 2.2 FINAL. And the tests ?
>
>
> OK 2.2 is really of FINAL quality. We have been really in a
> effective BETA
> for the past 3 month and I don't see people complaining on
> major stuff.
>
> The test situation is a bit more complex. JCTS has come a long way.
> JBossTest had things that made deep tests (the
> home.create(objectref)) that
> do not lend themselves to "UNIT" testing.
>
> 2.0 used to pass ALL of the jbosstest stuff and from what I
> can tell the
> problems we are seeing now are mostly from configuration of jbosstest.
>
> 2.2 is of FINAL quality, put it out already, it is hurting us.
>
> We need to move onto 2.3..
>
> marc
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> |Bordet, Simone
> |Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 8:48 AM
> |To: JBoss Development Mailing List (E-mail)
> |Cc: 'Ken Jenks'
> |Subject: [JBoss-dev] RE: JBoss 2.2 FINAL. And the tests ?
> |
> |
> |Hey Ken,
> |
> |> What's the test plan for this release?
> |
> |I don't know. AFAIK 2.1 is far better than 2.0, and passes more
> |(if not all)
> |tests of the JBossTest suite, I think also the Peter Braswell's CTS.
> |
> |But it's a good question. Anyone may answer better than me ? Marc ?
> |
> |Simon
> |
> |>
> |> -- Ken Jenks, http://abiblion.com/
> |>
> |> Tools for reading.
> |>
> |
> |_______________________________________________
> |Jboss-development mailing list
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
