On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:35:43AM -0400, David Jencks wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm confused.  Are you saying that the behavior mandated by the JCA spec is
> not sufficient to guarantee that every connection handle will used in the
> correct transaction?  If so, is this not a deficiency in the spec? If not,
> what is the JBossConnectionListener for more specifically?

JBossConnectionListener is part of the contract between JBossCX and a
connection manager, such as those provided by Minerva.  This contract is
not part of the JCA spec because it is considered part of the application
server.

Toby.

> thanks
> David Jencks
> 
> On 2001.05.05 23:51:29 -0400 Toby Allsopp wrote:
> > danch wrote:
> > 
> > > Does anyone have opinions on whether this would be a good feature or 
> > > not? The 1.1 spec does not specify how isolation levels should be 
> > > handled, except for BMT session beans, and by saying/implying that
> > beans 
> > > can call resource manager specific APIs to set it themselves
> > (carefully).
> > > 
> > > If this seems like a good idea, should this setting be in jboss.xml
> > (and 
> > > cover BMP and CMP entities as well as sessions), or in jaws.xml 
> > > (covering _only_ CMP entities, since others are free to call the 
> > > resource manager's APIs)?
> > 
> > What do mean by "cover BMP and CMP entities as well as sessions"?  This 
> > can only apply to JDBC connections, right?  Do you propose to set the 
> > isolation level when a connection handle is obtained by the bean?  If 
> > so, this should probably be implemented using the same mechanism I have 
> > in mind to implement beans hanging onto connection handles across 
> > transactions.
> > 
> > JBossCX defines the JBossConnectionListener interface for this purpose, 
> > although it is not currently used.  The idea is that when a resource 
> > adapter gives out a connection handle, the app server is notified so 
> > that it can make sure it is participating in the correct transaction. 
> > It would be easy to extend that to any transaction-specific setup we 
> > wanted to do.
> > 
> > Toby.

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to