No reason to tie an entire jar to a single datasource. I'll check my code
to see if it can support multiple datasources, although I don't think it
will work with most DBs. This would require the DBs to natively support
JDBC 2.0 XA transactions, and if I remember most DBs don't have 2-phase
commit drivers yet.
-dain
----- Original Message -----
From: "danch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JAWS -Single Datasource
> No reason, really. Enter it as a feature request. If you've time, post a
> patch, but look at Dain's 2.0 CMP stuff first
>
> -danch
>
> Vinay Menon wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there any specific reason why the <datasource> tag needs to be
> > applicable to the entire JAWS xml? This would mean that all the beans
> > essentially tie to the same datasource i.e. database and need splitting
> > up of the application into smaller units with their own separate
> > deployement descriptors. Or am I missing something?
> >
> >
> >
> > Vinay
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
> > http://explorer.msn.com <'http://explorer.msn.com'>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
