In browsing the spec,
Danny O' is right about not trashing the Stateful bean on a rollback. I was
only thinking about Entities when I made that comment(as was probably
Danch). Actually, the spec infers that a Stateful bean is not registered
with the TM unless it implements SessionSynchronization.
Regards,
Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
>
>
> so
>
> <fifteen minute time lapse>
>
> is the create the same? cannot be transactional??? or just remove?
>
> having problems with the new code as we speak
>
> marcf
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> |fleury
> |Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:26 PM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
> |
> |
> |chill pill bill...
> |
> |there is more fire coming, although when we volley back and
> forth like this
> |you must account for delivery lag,
> |
> |so everyone take a "chill pill bill" for 15 mins, when you come
> back we are
> |all synchronized :)
> |
> |ready ? so where are we, the requirements seems contradictorial
> at least to
> |me (but I didnt' take the chill pill and I want to finish the commits)
> |
> |marcf
> |
> ||-----Original Message-----
> ||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
> ||Burke
> ||Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:09 PM
> ||To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
> ||
> ||
> ||Just in case you didn't see the last email,
> ||
> ||statefulbean.remove() results in an exception when the bean is
> ||participating
> ||within a transaction. This is not allowed. Please see the spec!
> ||
> ||Bill
> ||
> ||> -----Original Message-----
> ||> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of marc
> ||> fleury
> ||> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:54 PM
> ||> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
> ||>
> ||>
> ||> fair enough, by popular demand
> ||>
> ||> remove() is not a transactional operation then,
> ||>
> ||> you call it? the stateful bean is gone, gone I tell you!
> ||>
> ||> marcf
> ||>
> ||> |-----Original Message-----
> ||> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> |Behalf Of danch
> ||> |(Dan Christopherson)
> ||> |Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:35 PM
> ||> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||> |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
> ||> |
> ||> |
> ||> |I agree with Bill - removing everything involved in the rolled-back
> ||> |transaction from the cache is a must.
> ||> |
> ||> |-danch
> ||> |
> ||> |Bill Burke wrote:
> ||> |
> ||> |> Nope, with the old code, B would be removed from the cache when
> ||> |b.remove()
> ||> |> was called even if it was invoked from within a transaction.
> ||Also, all
> ||> |> beans involved with a transaction would be removed from the
> |cache on a
> ||> |> rollback within InstanceSynchronization.
> ||> |>
> ||> |> I think that is the safe and correct approach to remove any
> ||> bean from the
> ||> |> cache that is part of a rollback. Otherwise you may have
> ||> corrupted data.
> ||> |>
> ||> |> Bill
> ||> |>
> ||> |>
> ||> |>>-----Original Message-----
> ||> |>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||> |>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> ||Behalf Of marc
> ||> |>>fleury
> ||> |>>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:57 PM
> ||> |>>To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> ||> |>>Subject: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
> ||> |>>
> ||> |>>
> ||> |>>as I wrap up the stuff, sanity check
> ||> |>>
> ||> |>>bean a and bean b
> ||> |>>
> ||> |>>a starts transaction and calls b.remove() and then rolls back
> ||> |>>
> ||> |>>b is still there in cache right?
> ||> |>>
> ||> |>>marcf
> ||> |>>
> ||> |>>_________________
> ||> |>>Marc Fleury, Ph.D
> ||> |>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||> |>>_________________
> ||> |
> ||> |
> ||> |
> ||> |_______________________________________________
> ||> |Jboss-development mailing list
> ||> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||> |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> ||>
> ||>
> ||>
> ||> _______________________________________________
> ||> Jboss-development mailing list
> ||> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> ||>
> ||
> ||
> ||
> ||_______________________________________________
> ||Jboss-development mailing list
> ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> |
> |
> |
> |_______________________________________________
> |Jboss-development mailing list
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
