> Well, that depends on taste. When the JMS RA was written it was mean to
> not be dependant on JBoss at all, but should be possible to use in any
> App server. There was one (easy to fix dependancy then). Changes done
> since then has tied it more closely to JBoss. I guess it would therefore
> be ok to integrate it even more tightly.
What changes make it JBoss specific?
> It is, however, questionable, if we then should really call it a J2EE
> connector resource adapter any more, because if its not spec compliant
> (i.e, working in any app server) it is no longer a J2EE connector
> resource adapter.
What is the spec sucks when it comes to logging?
> Since J2EE Connector 2.0 will include support for asynchrounous calls
> and the JMS spec and the connector spec will probably by integrating the
> transactional stuff for JMS through the connector spec, I think It is
> good to keep the JMS connector clean.
Me too, but I can't handle a PrintWriter for a log destination =(
--jason
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
