I agree-very long. How about MCFProperties?
On 2001.08.19 17:37:14 -0400 Toby Allsopp wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 12:17:26PM -0700, Jason Dillon wrote:
> > I would go for clearer names over legacy names.
>
> I agree, although ManagedConnectionFactoryProperties is enormously
> long. I would go for JNDIName over ConnectionFactoryName.
>
> Toby.
>
> > On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, David Jencks wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to suggest that we (I) change some of the attribute names in
> > > ConnectionFactoryLoader in jboss.jcml to make it a little clearer
> what they
> > > are for:
> > >
> > > new old
> > >
> > > ManagedConnectionFactoryProperties Properties
> > > ConnectionFactoryName -- or --JndiName FactoryName
> > >
> > >
> > > I'd also like to do this soon before many people start using them.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > david jencks
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
