----- Original Message -----
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBossFilesystemRoot mbean and sar local
directories. (rh/3.0)
> |> everyone else to find where stuff is. For instance, log4j can find its
> |> config files, the ServiceDeployer can find where to put local
> |directories,
> |> and your app can find where to look for its local directory. Is this
OK
> |> with everyone?
> |No, as I may not have a usable local filesystem. Resources should be
loaded
> |from thread context class loader, not a filesystem.
>
> You are right.
>
> That is true of resources. But I think the example that he took was
poorly
> chosen (config files). But in the case of MQ it still needs a file system
> to work so it is relevant that we ship it.
>
> The point where I am a bit torn is that we want to tell people "stop
> clinging on your FS, make it web friendly (what you talk about)" and on
the
> other hand we need to be realistic about the dependencies on FS these
days.
>
> I view this as an intermediary solution.
>
> marcf
>
A filesystem should just be another service just like JDBC. Ideally it
should be
accessed like any other securable managed resource via a resource factory.
This
is the direction we should be moving in.
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
